{"id":14971,"date":"2024-06-14T08:56:25","date_gmt":"2024-06-14T08:56:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/netfactual.com\/?p=14971"},"modified":"2024-06-14T08:56:29","modified_gmt":"2024-06-14T08:56:29","slug":"karlo-tanjuakio","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/netfactual.com\/factcheck\/karlo-tanjuakio\/","title":{"rendered":"Karlo Tanjuakio: Breach of Contract Allegations Fact-checked (2024)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Karlo Tanjuakio was sued in the United States District Court for the State of Hawaii for breach of contract after allegedly defrauding his business partners.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiffs Elisabeth Swan and Tracy O’Rourke applied for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against defendant Karlo Tanjuakio. The Plaintiffs seek temporary injunctive action to prevent Karlo Tanjuakio from breaching or continuing to breach his fiduciary duties to them as partners under the partnership agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This cooperation arrangement is popularly known as the “GoLeanSixSigma.com Partnership” or “GLSS”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
According to the Plaintiffs, Karlo Tanjuakio has breached his fiduciary obligations by neglecting to act in the best interests of the partnership and engaging in conduct <\/a>that has harmed the partnership. The plaintiffs claim Tanjuakio’s activities have caused significant harm to the partnership and its reputation.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, Karlo Tanjuakio rejects the partnership’s existence as well as the plaintiffs’ allegations. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Further Information on the Lawsuit Against Karlo Tanjuakio<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Plaintiffs Elisabeth Swan and Tracy O’Rourke filed a petition for the issuance of a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction <\/a>against Karlo Tanjuakio. The primary question in this lawsuit is whether GLSS is a partnership, which the court has found.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Although another defendant, Sion Lee, is also accused of being a partner, he has not appeared in court and is thought to be a nominal defendant <\/a>for the time being.<\/p>\n\n\n\n After evaluating the information offered and considering the briefing and oral arguments, the court found that, for the Motion for TRO, GLSS is a partnership<\/a>. This finding is crucial in determining whether Karlo Tanjuakio has breached his fiduciary duties as a partner, and if the Plaintiffs are entitled to injunctive relief to prevent further breaches.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Plaintiffs have asserted that Karlo Tanjuakio’s breaches of fiduciary obligations have caused them irreparable loss, warranting injunctive relief. They say that they will suffer harm to their ongoing business, which reflects many years of labor, and that business loss constitutes the prospect of “extinction”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n They have offered evidence to back up their claims, including Tanjuakio’s alleged agreement to the use of the “Justin-Time Cafe” podcast and “@jitcafe.com,” which occurred following his breaches. <\/p>\n\n\n\n A breach of contract occurs when one or more of the agreed-upon provisions of an official agreement are broken. The breach might range from a late payment to a more significant break, such as non-delivery of guaranteed products.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A violation of the contract may result in a disagreement between the parties, and the party not in breach of the agreement may seek remedies such as injury, precise execution, or termination of the contract. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
About Breach of Contract <\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n